Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:25

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sapiente nemo autem perspiciatis.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Farewell, Mr. Eclipse: Fred Espenak dies at 71 - Astronomy Magazine
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why is there no great temptress figure in any of Tolkien’s major works?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
This Image Shows Satellite Streaks Blocking Out the Arctic Sky - PetaPixel
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What to watch for in today’s NASCAR Cup race at Michigan International Speedway - NBC Sports
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Proba-3’s first artificial solar eclipse - European Space Agency